why the contructor have to be present

Question about the task

The simplest code: part 2

Java Core, Level 5, Lesson 6

Under discussion

public NormalCat() { } Hi, I am wondering, why the constructor have to be present in this case?

Comments (4)

Popular
New
Old

You must be signed in to leave a comment

Dawn( #11020889)

Level 37 , Toronto, Canada

12 October 2022, 04:36

I have the same question. lol

Emanuele Gurini

Level 18 , Porto Recanati, Italia

8 September 2019, 14:43

Hi Luyl, i think that when you extend a class, if you don not create the constructor, program made his own constructor without inheriting stuff from his parent; infact, how can you see from the exercise, public static class NakedCat has no parent, than does not need to inherit any stuff, and you can let class create is own constructor. Let me know if you agree with my explain.

Luyi

Level 31 , Kosice, Slovakia

8 September 2019, 17:10

Hello there, I am still not sure, to be honest. In my opinion the empty constructor is redudant there When I run the code without it, it works utterly fine.

null

Level 29 , Poznan, Poland

5 August 2019, 09:12

i'm curious too